Here are the minutes from tonight’s meeting. Happy (almost) Thanksgiving!
A Haverford Tradition
Students' Council is an elected body that advocates on behalf of students, serves as representatives to the Board of Managers, appoints students to all major committees at the College, and distributes the activities budget to all student clubs and groups.
Students' Council meets on Sundays at 8:30pm in the SC Room 309 in the Campus Center.
The Co-Presidents hold office hours on Mondays at 8pm in Zubrow Commons in the INSC.
Here are the minutes from tonight’s meeting. Happy (almost) Thanksgiving!
Here are the minutes from tonight’s meeting! Have a great week!
Here are this week’s minutes! Enjoy!
These are the minutes from our first meeting back from Fall Break.
Here are the minutes from yesterday evening!
Have a wonderful week and Fall Break!
Here are the minutes from tonight’s meeting! Have a lovely week!
Here are the minutes from tonight’s meeting! Have a great week!
Welcome back Fords! Here are the minutes from tonight’s meeting.
The Constitution of the Haverford College Students’ Association
Article I. Table of Contents. 1
Article II. Preamble. 5
Section 2.01 Name. 5
Section 2.02 Membership. 5
Section 2.03 Powers. 5
Section 2.04 Rights of Self-Government. 5
Article III. The Honor Code. 5
Section 3.01 Preamble. 5
Section 3.02 Introduction. 5
Section 3.03 Jurisdiction. 5
Section 3.04 Responsibilities. 6
(a) Academic. 6
(b) Social 6
Section 3.05 Community Standards. 6
Section 3.06 Confrontation. 7
Section 3.07 Upholding the Honor Code. 8
(a) The Pledge. 8
(b) Honor Council 8
(c) Consensus. 8
(d) Confidentiality. 9
Section 3.08 Ratifying the Honor Code. 9
Article IV. Legislative Powers. 10
Section 4.01 Regulations and Council Rules. 10
Section 4.02 Meetings of the Association. 10
(a) Meeting Dates. 10
(b) Honor Code Resolutions. 10
(c) Plenary Agenda. 10
(d) Previous Plenary Resolution Presentation. 11
(e) Students’ Council Agenda. 11
(f) Date Change. 11
(g) Resolution Signatures. 11
(h) Resolution Presentation. 11
(i) Resolution Meeting. 11
(j) Resolution Review.. 11
(k) Resolution Presentation. 11
Article V. Executive Powers. 12
Section 5.01 Students’ Council 12
Section 5.02 The Mandate of Students’ Council 13
(a) Complete the business of student government. 13
(b) Work closely and communicate with administration and faculty. 13
(c) Empower and support student leaders and initiatives. 13
(d) Take a proactive and forward-looking approach to identifying student issues and developing effective policy. 13
Section 5.03 Membership of Students’ Council 13
Section 5.04 Meeting of Students’ Council 13
Section 5.05 Co-Presidents of Students’ Council 13
Section 5.06 Duties of Students’ Council 13
(a) Presiding and Agenda. 13
(b) (Co-)Vice-President(s) 14
(c) (Co-)Secretary(ies) 14
(d) (Co-)Treasurer(s) 14
(e) Officer of Academics. 14
(f) Officer of the Arts. 14
(g) Officer of Athletics. 15
(h) Officer of Campus Life. 15
(i) Officer of Multiculturalism.. 15
(j) Honor Council (Co-)Chair(s) 15
(k) Class Representatives. 15
Section 5.07 Nomination and Election of Students’ Council 15
(a) General Procedures. 15
(b) Class Representative Procedures. 16
(c) Voting Procedures for Students’ Council 17
(d) Voting Procedures for the Class Representatives. 17
Section 5.08 Appointments. 18
(a) Appointments Meetings. 18
(b) Student Representative Responsibilities. 19
(c) Confidentiality. 19
(d) Grounds for Impeachment. 19
(e) Appointments Committee Review.. 20
Section 5.09 Special Events Committee for Students. 20
Section 5.10 Budgetary Guidelines. 21
(a) Responsibility and Powers of the Office of the Treasurer. 21
(b) Fund Utilization. 21
(c) Required Financial Information. 22
(d) Eligibility Requirements. 22
(e) Governing Rules. 23
(f) The Transfer of Allotted Funds. 24
(g) The Speakers Committee. 25
Section 5.11 Duties of Students’ Council Members. 25
Section 5.12 Duties of the Honor Council of the Students’ Association. 25
Section 5.13 Committees. 25
Article VI. Judicial Powers. 25
Section 6.01 Composition of Honor Council 25
Section 6.02 Responsibilities of Honor Council 26
(a) Responsibilities to the Community. 26
(b) Responsibilities to the Individual 28
(c) Responsibilities Within Honor Council 28
(d) Responsibilities of the Honor Council (Co-)Secretary(ies) 29
(e) Responsibilities of the Honor Council (Co-)Chair(s) 30
(f) Responsibilities of the Librarian. 31
Section 6.03 Honor Council Elections. 32
(a) Honor Council Composition. 32
(b) Honor Council Nominations. 32
(c) Election Procedures. 32
(d) Special Elections. 32
(e) Voting Procedures for Honor Council Elections. 34
Article VII. Trial Procedure. 35
Section 7.01 Types of Trials. 35
(a) Academic Trial 35
(b) Social Trial 35
(c) Student Facilitation Panel 36
(d) Joint Student/Administrative Panel 38
(e) Deans’ Panel 39
(f) Summer Trial 40
(g) Student Panel 40
Section 7.02 Universal Trial Procedure. 40
(a) Pre-Trial 40
(b) Role of the Honor Council (Co-)Chair in a Trial: 41
(c) Role of the Jury in a Trial: 41
(d) Role of the Support Person: 41
(e) Role of Bi-Co Liaison. 42
(f) The Actual Trial: 42
Section 7.03 Special Concerns. 45
(a) Clarification of Judicial Procedures. 45
(b) Administrative Concerns: 45
(c) Harassment: 45
(d) Sexual Crimes: 45
(e) Violence or Threat of Violence. 45
(f) Special Cases. 46
(g) Confrontation of Staff or Faculty. 46
(h) Situations Where Formal Adjudication Does Not Appear Necessary. 46
(i) Interests of Fairness. 46
(j) Recommendations. 46
(k) Extenuating Circumstances. 46
Article VIII. Resignation and Removal of Officers and Council Members. 46
Section 8.01 Vacancies. 46
Section 8.02 Removal 47
Section 8.03 Challenging Elections. 48
Article IX. Clearness Committee. 48
Section 9.01 Subjects of Evaluation. 48
(a) Evaluation. 48
(b) Consensus. 48
(c) Queries. 49
Section 9.02 Criteria of Evaluation. 49
(a) Responsiveness. 49
(b) Sustainability. 49
(c) Adherence to the Honor Code. 49
Section 9.03 Timeline. 49
(a) Census. 49
(b) Interviews. 49
Section 9.04 The Report. 49
(a) December Report. 49
(b) Archival 49
Article X. Amendments. 50
Section 10.01 Proposal Amendments. 50
Section 10.02 Ratification. 50
Section 10.03 Availability. 50
Article XI. Previous Constitution Invalid. 50
The name of this association will be the Students’ Association of Haverford College.
All students enrolled at Haverford College and all Bryn Mawr College undergraduates residing in Haverford dormitories are ipso facto members of the Students’ Association.
All powers herein defined derive from the Students’ Association and are delegated by it to such bodies of its own creation as are needed to carry out the functions of student self-government.
The Administration of Haverford College grants the right of student self-government to the Students’ Association provided that the Students’ Association maintains the standards of the College to the satisfaction of the Administration.
As Haverford students, we seek an environment in which members of a diverse community can live together, interact, and learn from one another in ways that protect both personal freedom and community standards. For our diverse community to prosper, we must embrace our differences and be mindful of our varied perspectives and backgrounds; this goal is only possible if students seek mutual understanding by means of respectful communication. The Honor Code holds us accountable for our words and actions, and guides us in resolving conflicts by engaging each other in dialogue..
Our adherence to this written expression of our shared values establishes an open environment of learning and growing through personal and community responsibility. Because we subscribe to these values, we commit as members of the Haverford community to follow the Honor Code.
We uphold the Code by engaging with the values upon which our community depends: mutual trust, concern, and respect for oneself, one another and the community. These values form the basis of the Honor Code, yet improve our community only if we incorporate them into our daily lives.
The Honor Code applies to every aspect of student life at Haverford College, academic or social. All students at Haverford, including Bryn Mawr, Swarthmore and University of Pennsylvania students enrolled in Haverford courses, are obligated to adhere to the Code, and are under its jurisdiction while on this campus and while doing work for Haverford courses. Haverford students studying at other institutions are similarly compelled to conduct themselves in accordance with the Code.
Our community also includes the faculty, staff, and administration. For this reason, the student body asks that these members of the community work with us in the spirit of the Code.
As students we are responsible for proper conduct and integrity in all of our scholastic work. We must follow a professor’s instructions as to the completion of all academic work, and must ask for clarification if the instructions are not clear. Students should not give or receive aid when taking exams, unless the professor specifies this practice as appropriate.
A student commits an act of plagiarism as defined by the Faculty Handbook if he or she represents “another person’s ideas or scholarship as his/her own” (p 53). An act of plagiarism constitutes a student’s withdrawal from the commitment to the academic honesty required by the Honor Code, and will normally result in separation from the community and the recommendation of a grade change.
To avoid plagiarism, students are expected to properly cite (in footnotes, quotations, and bibliography) all sources, including memorized and reproduced material, used in the preparation of written work, including examinations, unless otherwise instructed by the professor who assigned the work. It is each student’s responsibility to be conscious of his or her work habits and to find out exactly what each of his or her professors expects in terms of acknowledging sources of information on papers, exams, and assignments.
Our community’s social relationships are also based on mutual trust, concern and respect. We must consider how our words and actions, regardless of the medium, may affect the sense of acceptance essential to an individual’s or group’s participation in the community. We strive to foster an environment that genuinely encourages respectful expression of differing values in honest and open discussion. Upon encountering actions or values that we find degrading to ourselves and to others, we should initiate dialogue with the goal of increasing mutual understanding.
As part of the Haverford community, we are obligated to reflect on our own actions as well as the actions of those around us in light of their effect on the community and confront others when their conduct disturbs us. We must also report our own breaches to Honor Council if it becomes clear through self-reflection or through expressions of concern by others that our academic or social conduct represents a violation of community standards. We are obligated to report ourselves even if doing so may result in a trial and the possibility of separation from the college.
Confrontation, in the Haverford sense, refers to initiating a dialogue with another community member about a potential violation of the Honor Code with the goal of reaching a common understanding by means of respectful communication. Regardless of the scale of the issue, confrontation should ideally take the form of a constructive, face-to-face discussion. It should be understood that achieving a common understanding does not necessarily mean reaching agreement.
This process is a dialogue, in which each party first tries to understand the personal standards and values of the other in order to create a restorative process. The Code and confrontation with the intent for a trial are not to be used as a threatening device. To do so would go against the spirit of the Code and the goal of achieving mutual understanding.
We cannot always expect to feel at ease when confronting another student about his or her actions. However, we must each take upon ourselves the responsibilities stated in the Code: since we hold ourselves responsible for each other, the failure to confront or to report another student involved in a breach of the Honor Code is itself a violation of the Code.
In the case of social concerns, conflicts can ideally be resolved through this initial stage of respectful communication and dialogue; Honor Council should become involved only in situations where the trust of the community as a whole may have been violated or where the perceived breach defies the parties’ abilities to resolve the situation on their own.
While an initial confrontation should also occur in the case of academic concerns, academic violations of the Code cannot be resolved between the confronted and confronting parties alone because such violations also constitute a breach of trust with the community. Therefore, unless it is indisputable that an academic violation did not occur, the confronted student must report him or herself to Honor Council.
If a confronting party has asked a confronted student to take him or herself to Honor Council, and Honor Council has not acknowledged this report to the confronting party within one week of the request, then the confronting party is obligated to report the matter to Honor Council.
Members of the faculty follow a similar procedure in cases of suspected academic violations. They first discuss the problem with the student; then, if not satisfied that a breach of the Code did not occur, urge the student to report him or herself to Honor Council. If the student does not do so within one week, the faculty member reports the matter to the Honor Council.
As confrontation is often a matter between two individuals or parties, it is advisable to exercise discretion and respect privacy accordingly when initiating a dialogue. A member of Honor Council may act on behalf of another student in an initial confrontation if this process would cause the student involved undue emotional anguish or place him or her in physical danger.
We realize that as part of the Haverford College community, our actions affect those around us. We understand that membership in the Haverford community is dependent on our commitment to the Honor Code, and we proclaim this by signing the Honor Pledge, which states:
“I hereby accept the Haverford Honor Code, realizing that it is my duty to uphold the Honor Code and the concepts of personal and collective responsibility upon which it is based.”
We all must sign the Honor Pledge prior to our admission or readmission to the college, and our withdrawal from this commitment will result in separation from the community.
While the success of the Honor Code is dependent upon each of us actively engaging with the Code’s ideals, some administrative responsibilities must be carried out by a community body. In addition, we may sometimes be unable to resolve conflicts with others, or actions may occur which breach the trust of the community in a particularly serious way.
Honor Council’s task is to manage the administrative aspects of the Honor Code and to help resolve difficult situations and apparent violations of the community’s trust. Honor Council is charged with interpreting the sections of the Code that leave room for flexibility. It is, for example, Honor Council’s responsibility to decide if a situation warrants the convening of a trial or if it can be resolved through other means of dialogue and restoration.
Although Honor Council trials are not intended as punitive proceedings, there are repercussions for violating the Code. The goals of Honor Council proceedings are threefold: to hold any individual who violated the Code accountable, to educate the individuals involved, and to restore individuals who violated the Code to the Haverford community. Such proceedings should also take into account the needs of the community.
Honor Council is a self-regulating body; therefore, members are obligated to confront each other and the administration regarding errors and points of dissent with proper procedure in relation to the Honor Code and Council’s internal affairs, especially if they feel they are not fulfilling their community responsibilities or fully abiding by the Code. Honor Council members are responsible to the entire Haverford community to do so.
The Haverford community recognizes consensus as a valuable decision-making tool. For this reason, all decisions made by Honor Council, including those approving Council publications, are made by consensus. This method depends on reaching unity, requiring patience and open-mindedness.
It should be noted, however, that unity does not necessarily require unanimity. When discussion has reached a point when a proposed decision clearly has the support of the “weight of the group,” remaining dissenters may stand outside consensus in order to achieve unity. In Honor Council proceedings, there may be no more than two such dissenters. If the disagreement is fundamental and a matter of conscience, a dissenter may block consensus and discussion must continue with the object of finding a solution that is satisfactory to all.
As confrontation is often not a public matter, Honor Council cases will be kept in the strictest confidence. This allows individuals in the community to bring issues to Honor Council without fear of attaching a public stigma to parties involved. However, Honor Council must balance this need for confidentiality with the community’s right to be informed. One way of maintaining this balance is through pseudonymized abstracts of trial proceedings.
At Spring Plenary, there must be a vote by two-thirds of those present in favor of opening ratification of the Code. If this occurs, the electronic ratification system will be open the fourth and fifth days following Spring Plenary.
If two-thirds of those assembled at Plenary do not vote to open ratification of the Honor Code, the Code fails the first round of ratification. To subsequently ratify the Code, students must create and circulate a petition requesting the convening of a Special Plenary to enable ratification to open. Forty percent of students must sign this petition conveying their desire for such a Special Plenary and pledging to attend.
During the ratification period, Honor Council will schedule eight hours each day of tabling to answer any questions and receive any criticism of the Honor Code which might arise. This council member will have a computer with network access which students may use to ratify the code. Each student is strongly encouraged under the Honor Code to vote or to communicate to Honor Council reasons why he or she did not or could not.
Ratification ballots will have three options and a space for comments, suggestions, or criticisms. Filling in this space for comments will be required by the electronic ballot. The ballot will read as follows:
A) I have thoughtfully considered my position on the Code and I vote for its ratification for the following reason(s):
B) I have thoughtfully considered my position on the Code and I vote for its ratification, but I have the following objection(s):
C) I have thoughtfully considered my position on the Code, and I do not vote for its ratification for the following reason(s):
If more than two-thirds of the student body chooses option “A” or “B”, the Honor Code is ratified. If less than two-thirds of the student body chooses option “A” or “B” but more than two-thirds of the student body votes, the Honor Code fails, and a Special Plenary will be scheduled to modify the Code in such a way as to enable a two-thirds majority to vote for ratification.
If less than two-thirds of the student body votes, the Honor Code fails. Students should strongly consider the wisdom of convening a Special Plenary. Such a Plenary would be convened only if forty percent of the student body signs a petition not only asking for the Plenary, but pledging to attend. At a Special Plenary, three-quarters of the student body would constitute quorum, and votes in favor of ratification by two-thirds of the student body would be required for ratification to occur.
Should the Honor Code fail ratification, the Haverford Community will continue to observe the Honor Code’s rules and guidelines until the end of the current semester. If no Honor Code is ratified before the semester ends, the Code will cease to be in effect. Further Plenaries may still be convened to ratify an Honor Code.
Upon its ratification, we renew our commitment to the Honor Code and we pledge to uphold these ideals through the conduct of our daily lives.
The Students’ Association will make regulations governing the conduct of the students on campus consistent with the Honor Code. The Students’ Association delegates such legislative authority to Students’ Council as is necessary to carry out its functions herein provided for. Such legislation will be well publicized. The Students’ Association reserves to itself the ultimate legislative authority, to be exercised only in Plenary session.
The Students’ Association will meet in Plenary session twice yearly. The number of students required for quorum will be fifty (50) percent of the Students’ Association. When computing quorum, students studying away will not be counted when determining the total number of the Students’ Association. Plenary sessions shall be publicized as far in advance as possible of the time scheduled for the Plenary session.
In the fall and spring the Association will meet on a Sunday within the first five weeks of the semester, specified in advance by the Students’ Council Co-Presidents in the spring of the preceding year.
Resolutions passed in the fall that require changes in the Honor Code will be withheld from use until Spring ratification.
The order of the Plenary agenda will be determined by the committee and will define matter of precedence.
Directly following the presentation of the Plenary agenda, the President(s) of the Students’ Association will report on the current state of resolutions that were passed at the previous semester’s plenary.
The Co-Presidents of Students’ Council will present the Students’ Council agenda for the current semester to the Students’ Association. This shall take place prior to the presentation of resolutions. There shall be a fifteen minute pro-con discussion of the agenda which may be extended based on the accepted rules of plenary. Students’ Council shall provide a forum for further discussion of the agenda at the Students’ Council meeting directly following Plenary.
It is the responsibility of the Students’ Council Co-Presidents at the spring scheduling meeting to change the date if there is a conflict with a scheduled religious event.
In order to bring a resolution to Plenary, the person(s) submitting the resolution must collect two hundred (200) signatures of the members of the Students’ Association. Students’ signatures will represent their support of the value of discussion of issues contained in the resolution, but may not necessarily represent a vote for the resolution. Resolution presenters are responsible for collecting signatures before a deadline specified in advance by the Students’ Council Co-Presidents.
Proposals must be submitted to a Students’ Council-appointed Committee by a deadline specified in advance by the Students’ Council Co-Presidents. This committee will review all resolutions and assure that proper research and preparation has been executed, including discussion with the administration on pertinent matters. This review completed, Students’ Council will distribute the resolutions to the Students’ Association in time for discussion.
Before Plenary, Students’ Council will sponsor a publicized meeting on the issues to discuss and further shape the proposals. This meeting must occur before signatures are collected if changes to the proposals are to be made.
If a meeting at which an issue is discussed is perceived by any member of the student community to be misrepresentative, this student can apply to the Students’ Council Co-Presidents for a formal hearing before the full Plenary at the time of the relevant proposal. The President has vested in him or her the responsibility to assure that the prepared speakers at Plenary fairly, and completely, represent all views, even minority views.
Within seven (7) days of the close of the Plenary session, the Co-Presidents of Students’ Council will present all passed Plenary resolutions to the President of the College and all senior administrative staff for review. Within thirty (30) days, it is the responsibility of the Co-Presidents to gather a formal written response from the President of the College regarding the state of each resolution and to distribute the statement to the Students’ Association. If the President of the College approves a resolution it will take effect as soon as possible unless otherwise stated in the resolution. Should the President of the College not approve a resolution, the President of Students’ Council will hold a discussion session about the resolution. A new Plenary may be called by petition of twenty percent (20%) of the members of the Students’ Association, or by the President of Students’ Council where a revised resolution may be presented.
All Haverford computer clusters will be closed Plenary Sundays. The Co-Presidents of Students’ Council and members of the community including faculty are responsible for asking all pertinent College offices refrain from scheduling events (guest speakers, athletics, etc.) on the semi- annually scheduled Plenary Sundays. The Co-Presidents of the Students’ Association are strongly encouraged to take any additional desirable steps in regards to communication with all pertinent College offices and faculty to make Plenary as accessible as possible.
Should quorum not be reached at the scheduled plenary session of a given semester, everything to be ratified at that plenary session fails. When this occurs in the spring semester, the Honor Code fails. If quorum is lost at any point, no more resolutions may be passed until quorum is regained.
Further Plenary sessions may only be called when the Co-Presidents of the Students’ Association receive a petition signed by forty percent (40%) of the members of the Students’ Association calling for such a plenary. Quorum for this plenary must be seventy-five (75) percent of the Students’ Association. Such plenary sessions will be held at the soonest available opportunity.
It is the responsibility of the President of Students’ Council to ensure that all students have access to an unabridged copy of the Constitution and Honor Code. If the version of the Constitution and Honor Code published for all students is incomplete or abridged in any way, specifically including the omission of changes made at Plenary, then a new, corrected and unabridged version must be available to all students within one month of the distribution of the abridged version at the expense of the Students’ Council operating budget. If this new version is still abridged, new versions will be published and distributed until a complete version is available.
The executive power of the Students’ Association is vested in Students’ Council.
Students’ Council shall
The members of Students’ Council will be the Students’ Council Co-Presidents, and the elected officials of Students’ Council, namely the (Co-)Vice-President(s), (Co-)Secretary(ies), (Co-)Treasurer(s), Officer of Academics, Officer of the Arts, Officer of Athletics, Officer of Campus Life and the Officer of Multiculturalism. In order to ensure that each class year sees representation on Students’ Council, each class will have one (1) Class Representative serve on Students’ Council for a total of four (4) Class Representatives
The Presidents of Students’ Council will call a meeting at least once every two weeks. A quorum of the Council will consist of two-thirds (2/3) of the membership. Upon written request of at least five (5) members of Students’ Council, an official meeting of the body will be called immediately. Special Meetings of Students’ Council shall serve as an open forum for community discussion and discussion of their business should be limited. All meetings of Students’ Council, except those concerned exclusively with appointments and awards, will be public.
The Co-Presidents of Students’ Council will serve as the chief officers. The Co-Presidents will preside at all Plenary sessions of the Association. The Co-Presidents will set the agenda and preside over meetings of Students’ Council and oversee the business of the other members of Students’ Council. The Co-Presidents shall serve as the primary bridge between the Students’ Association, the administration, and the Board of Managers. The Co-Presidents oversee, certify, and publish the results of Students’ Council elections, specifying the names of the candidates and making vote tallies available upon request. Each year the Co-Presidents will supervise the presentation of the system of student self-government to the first-year class. In the absence of the (Co-)Vice-President(s), the (Co-)Secretary(ies), or the (Co-)Treasurer(s) from any Plenary session, the President can appoint from other members of the Council a (Co-)Vice-President(s), (Co-)Secretary(ies), or (Co-)Treasurer(s) pro tempore.
The Co-Presidents shall set the agenda and preside over meetings of Students’ Council.
The Co-Presidents shall gather a formal written response from the President of the College regarding the state of each passed resolution and to distribute it to the Students’ Association within thirty (30) days of the close of the plenary session. The Co-Presidents are then responsible for following-up on the implementation of passed Plenary resolutions and will release a report at the end of the semester on the state of the resolutions. The report will be presented at the subsequent Plenary session.
The Co-Presidents will be responsible for updating the constitution with approved resolutions and for ensuring that there are no inconsistencies in language or formatting.
The (Co-)Vice-President(s) of Students’ Council shall serve as the chair(s) of the Appointments Committee. The (Co-)Vice-President(s) shall communicate and work with student representatives to faculty-student committees.
The (Co-)Secretary(ies) of Students’ Council shall record the business of Students’ Council. The (Co-)Secretary(ies) shall be responsible for the distribution of minutes, updating the Students’ Council website, and maintaining the Haverpedia page. The (Co-)Secretary(ies) shall be the administrator of all Students’ Council and Honor Council elections. The (Co-)Secretary(ies) shall release a semesterly State of Students’ Council Report with reports from each Students’ Council office.
The (Co-)Treasurer(s) of Students’ Council shall disburse the funds of the Students’ Association and shall keep a permanent record of all transactions. Prior to budgeting each semester, the (Co-)Treasurer(s) must hold a Student Club Meeting with the Officer of Campus Life. He or she must abide by the rules set out in the Budgetary Guidelines (Section 5.10). When retiring from office, he or she shall post or publish for the inspection of the members of the Students’ Association a summary of his or her accounts. The (Co-)Treasurer(s) must keep regular office hours (at least once per month) to disperse funds and field requests and questions from the student body.
The Officer of Academics shall be responsible for voicing academic questions and concerns to Students’ Council. The Academic Officer shall serve as the primary bridge between departmental majors and Students’ Council on issues pertaining to academics. He or she shall serve as Students’ Council’s representative to all faculty meetings and shall serve as one student representative to the Educational Policy Committee (EPC).
The Officer of the Arts shall be responsible for voicing student concerns pertaining to the arts. He or she shall serve as the primary bridge between Students’ Council and the Hurford Center for the Arts and Humanities, the James House Board, and student groups with a focus on the fine and performing arts.
The Officer of Athletics shall be responsible for voicing concerns pertaining to athletics. He or she shall serve as the primary bridge between Athletics and Students’ Council, and shall work closely with HCAA.
The Officer of Campus Life shall be responsible for voicing concerns pertaining to student life on campus. He or she shall serve as the primary bridge between Students’ Council and activities, and shall work closely with the Students’ Council Special Events Committee, the Director of Student Activities, and the Dean of Student Life. Prior to budgeting each semester, the Officer of Campus Life must hold a Student Club Meeting with the (Co-) Treasurer(s), and shall work closely with student clubs. He or she shall serve as the point person for dorm concerns from students, and shall work with the Director of Facilities Management, the Director of Residential Life, and the Dorm Resource People on pressing dorm issues and major facilities projects.
The Officer of Multiculturalism shall voice student concerns pertaining to multiculturalism. He or she shall serve as the primary bridge between Students’ Council and the Office of Multicultural Affairs and shall work closely with affinity groups on campus.
The Honor Council (Co-)Chair(s) will serve as coordinator(s) of Honor Council and will carry out Honor Council’s responsibility in working with the Dean of the College and other administration and faculty.
Each Class Representative shall be responsible for voicing perspectives and concerns pertaining specifically to the needs and desires of students in his or her class year to Students’ Council. Each Class Representative shall serve as the primary bridge between Students’ Council and his or her class, and will be responsible for keeping his or her class informed about and involved with Students’ Council
Nominations for the following offices of Students’ Council — Co-Presidents, (Co-)Vice-President(s), (Co-)Secretary(ies), (Co-)Treasurer(s), Officer of Academics, Officer of the Arts, Officer of Athletics, Officer of Campus Life and the Officer of Multiculturalism—will open the second Friday of April and will close on a deadline specified by the Students’ Council (Co-)Secretary(ies). All candidates for office must supply a written statement outlining his or her reasons for running and objectives for his or her term to be eligible to run for office. The election will take place during the third week of April. Nominations and elections for the officers of Students’ Council will be restricted to members of the Students’ Association who intend to be enrolled at Haverford College for the duration of their term in office. A nominated (Co-)Vice-President, (Co-)Secretary, or (Co-)Treasurer may consist of no more than two (2) individual members of the Students’ Association. A nominated Officer (Officer of Academics, Officer of the Arts, Officer of Athletics, Officer of Campus Life, or Officer of Multiculturalism) may consist of no more than one (1) member of the Students’ Association.
There will be one (1) elected representative from each class. Representatives to Students’ Council will be elected from each class year within the first four weeks of each semester, by a date specified by the (Co-)Secretary(ies) of Students’ Council. All candidates for office must supply a written statement outlining his or her reasons for running and objectives for his or her term to be eligible to run for office.
Appointments Meetings shall be chaired by the (Co-)Vice President(s) and be composed of the Officer of Academics, the Officer of the Arts, the Officer of Athletics, the Officer of Campus Life, the Officer of Multiculturalism, and the four Class Representatives.
All appointments shall be conducted by consensus. If consensus cannot be reached the appointment, at the discretion of the (Co-)Vice President(s), may be re-opened for applications immediately or at a future date.
All appointed student committee representatives must maintain contact with Students’ Council, specifically the office of (Co-)Vice President(s), throughout the year.
When the (Co-)Vice President(s) release the annual Appointments Report, all student representatives must submit committee reports to the (Co-)Vice President(s) in a timely matter.
All appointed students shall be required to attend as many meetings of their committees as possible.
Members of the four standing committees – the Long Range Planning Committee, the Educational Policy Committee, the Administrative Advisory Committee and the Faculty Committee on Admission, will be required to attend meetings of Students’ Council upon request.
All student committee representatives must continually involve the Haverford Students’ Association in all discussions being held in respective committees. Forums and other pre-arranged opportunities to speak with student representatives are highly encouraged.
All student committee representatives should discuss confidentiality guidelines with committee Chair(s) at the beginning of each academic year.
All discussions, information, statistics, minutes, and reports not deemed confidential within committee shall be made available to Haverford Students’ Association.
Haverford Students’ Association shall be given an opportunity to request specific, non-confidential information from student representatives.
Appointed students are selectively chosen to serve as the Haverford Students’ Association’s liaison and voice on specific college committees. If a representative repeatedly fails to attend meetings without valid reason for absence, an Appointments Committee may be convened to review the status of appointed student.
Appointed students must involve the Haverford Students’ Association in all relevant discussions. Repeated failure to do so sufficiently may result in an Appointments Committee Review.
Repeated failure to follow given guidelines regarding confidentiality and releasing public information may result in an Appointments Committee Review.
Appointments Committee may hold a meeting to discuss impeachment and termination of a student committee representative’s appointment to a certain committee.
Appointments Committee should speak with representative before any discussion of impeachment occurs.
Impeachment shall be a last resort in all matters of ineffective student representation. Appointments Committee is encouraged to speak to and work with the representative in question, to attempt to improve his/her quality of representation.
If Appointment Committee deems that the student representative is not effectively serving the Haverford Students’ Association, the Committee has the power to impeach the representative, using consensus.
When a representative is impeached, the matter shall be brought to Students’ Council to be discussed and voted upon by the entire body.
A two-thirds majority of Students’ Council present is required for removal of the representative. Appointments Committee shall fill the open appointment as soon as possible, at a date and time selected by the (Co-)Vice President(s).
Students’ Council Special Events Committee for Students shall consist of two co-heads appointed by Appointments Committee for a one-year term, as well as 4 to 6 recruited members who shall serve a year-long term. The co-heads shall recruit members who represent a range of classes for the committee. The Special Events Committee is responsible for the planning of special events and shall work closely with the Director of Student Activities to plan and advertise special events for Students’ Council. The delegation of responsibilities is left to the discretion of the co-heads; however, a structure that assigns committee members specific tasks is recommended.
The Students’ Council Office of the Treasurer is responsible for the fair and impartial distribution of Students’ Council funds to the organizations and clubs of the Haverford Student Body and Bi-Co community through the Budgeting Committee. The Budgeting Committee shall be chaired by the (Co-)Treasurer(s) and shall consist of the Officer of Academics, the Officer of the Arts, the Officer of Athletics, the Officer of Campus Life, and the Officer of Multiculturalism.
The Office of the Treasurer is responsible for keeping an accurate account of the Students’ Council treasury and ensuring its financial stability.
To ensure the fiscal responsibility of the Office of the Treasurer, the Director of Student Activities will also be included on the Students’ Council account in a purely advisory capacity.
The Office of the Treasurer is empowered to develop a separate fund or investment policy for surplus monies provided that it operates within the rules governing the budgeting process and the Office of the Treasurer and does not undermine the stability of the treasury.
Student organizations should utilize all sources of financial support available, i.e. the Deans’ Office, President’s Office, academic departments, Office of Multicultural Affairs, the Hurford Center for the Arts and Humanities, the Center for Peace and Global Citizenship, Students’ Council, etc.
Any group that requests funding from Students’ Council must fully disclose all sources of financial support including total balance of assets existing in external accounts.
Organizations must appropriately publicize opportunities to become a member of the organization.
Organizations must appropriately publicize events held on campus that are funded by Students’ Council.
All organizations that wish to receive Students’ Council funding must designate one individual member as the official contact. The Budgeting committee will consider this contact financially responsible for any of his or her organization’s overdrafts. This member will be responsible for keeping accurate records of their organization’s spending. Due to this responsibility, only this member may submit check requests for the organization.
At least one member from each organization applying for Students’ Council funding must attend the Student Club Meeting to be held at the beginning of each semester. This meeting shall be led by the (Co-)Treasurer(s) and Officer of Campus Life and attended by the (Co-)Secretary(ies). The purpose of the meeting is to inform clubs about the budgeting process, and facilitate communication between clubs and Students’ Council.
Students’ Council funds may not be used for food and drink at parties or events funded or funded in part by Students’ Council unless the food or drink is essential to the event and goals of the organizing group. The purchase of alcohol or drugs using Students’ Council allotted money is strictly prohibited.
Any use of Students’ Council funds for personal investment or profit is prohibited.
Students’ Council funds may not be used to directly contribute to political campaigns, external political organizations (not limited to political parties), external religious organizations, or any other external organization such as charities.
Budgeting Committee allocations may only fund group meetings of campus religious or political organizations that are open to all and well publicized to the campus community.
The Office of Treasurer is responsible for illuminating where the Students’ Council funds have been allocated with regard to each individual group.
An organization may not use Students’ Council funds for any other activity outside of those budgeted by the Budgeting Committee without prior notification of the Treasurer(s).
After the Budgeting Committee has completed the budgetary process, the Office of the Treasurer is to present Students’ Council with the finalized budget. The budget must then be ratified by consensus.
The specified individual according to (d)(iii) may pick up requested checks during a time specified by the Office of the Treasurer or another time mutually agreed upon by the (Co-)Treasurer(s) and the club contact.
The Office of the Treasurer reserves the right to refuse to honor a check request from an organization that does not adhere to the spirit and letter of the standing rules of Students’ Council allocations. The refusal may be appealed to the Students’ Council. This appeal will be directed to the (Co-)Secretary(ies) of Students’ Council, and a simple majority of Students’ Council is necessary to overturn the (Co-)Treasurer’s action.
Budgeted money that is not used by student organizations during the semester will not roll over to the following semester’s budget for the student organization. Instead, all remaining funds will remain in the Students’ Council general budget to be redistributed through the budgeting process the following semester.
In the unique circumstances where Students’ Council funds are transferred to independent checking accounts, the organization that the account exists under must still provide a detailed description of how those funds are spent throughout the semester.
The Speakers Committee will be budgeted a minimum of fifteen thousand dollars each semester.
The Office of the Treasurer is empowered to budget additional funds to the Speakers’ Committee, upon its discretion, provided it does not jeopardize the stability of the treasury or act contrary to the obligations of the office.
The Officer of Academics, Officer of the Arts, the Officer of Athletics, the Officer of Campus Life, and the Officer of Multiculturalism will serve on the Budgeting Committee until the semesterly budget is passed and on the Appointments Committee until the end of their term. They will be responsible for communicating the views of the members of his or her area of expertise to Students’ Council or any of its committees. He or she will participate in Students’ Council to make all policy decisions, to appoint all committee members, to allocate the budget, and to represent the Students’ Association in every way shape and form, thereby making sure that every member of the community has representation. This representation may be academic, social, political, or any other manner in which the community feels it should be represented. Additionally, the Class Representatives will serve on the Appointments Committee for the duration of their term.
The Honor Council of the Students’ Association will administer all aspects of the Honor Code and be responsible for interpretation of specific matters pertaining to the Honor Code. Each year, the Honor Council will work in conjunction with the Honor Code Orienteer (HCO) Committee as both groups see fit to present the Honor Code to the First-year Class.
Each Students’ Council will have the power to establish such committees as it deems necessary to aid in the execution of its duties.
Article VI. Judicial Powers
Section 6.01 Composition of Honor Council
Honor Council is an elected group of 16 students (four from each class) that manages the administrative aspects of the Honor Code on behalf of the community. Council may be required to resolve difficult situations and apparent violations of the community’s trust. Honor Council is charged with interpreting the sections of the Code that leave room for flexibility, are vague or have contradictory readings. Among the administrative responsibilities of Honor Council are the following: producing literature about the Code for prospective students; introducing first year students, transfers, new faculty members, administration and staff to the Code; publishing abstracts about past cases; advising faculty about specific situations they may discover; and informing the community of campus issues related to the Code.
Section 6.02 Responsibilities of Honor Council
(a) Responsibilities to the Community
1) Abstract Release: In the interest of keeping the community informed, Honor Council will release abstracts with pertinent information about completed trials, Joint Student/Administrative Panels, SFPs, and potentially mediations. Abstracts are detailed enough to outline the issues, but vague enough to protect the confidentiality of the people involved. No names or revealing information such as specific dates, classes, instructors, or, in social cases, any detailed information which would identify any individual, are included.
2) Abstract Writing Timeline under Normal Circumstances: The abstract co-authors should complete the abstract within two weeks of receiving the chair’s report, unless they request an extension by the last Council meeting before the original deadline. Honor Council Co-Chairsmay grant a one-week extension or assign an additional Council member who served on the jury to assist them. The chair of the trial will then cleanse the abstract of confidential information before sending the abstract to Council. Honor Council should take no more than two weeks for internal review to revise the abstract. During this time the chair may also request jury members to provide feedback on the abstract. At the completion of this revision process, the tentative abstract will be submitted to all Honor Council members for approval at the next Honor Council meeting. At this time Council will approve this abstract or consent on a revision process if there are concerns with the abstract that cannot be resolved in a single Council meeting. After the text of the abstract has been approved, Honor Council will then reach consensus on whether or not to delay the publication of the abstract. This entire process should take no longer than 9 weeks in which classes are in session. Honor Council will acknowledge its success or failure in meeting this timeline in each abstract it releases.
3) Abstract Delay: Abstracts must be released immediately upon Honor Council reaching consensus in approving an abstract for publication, unless one or more of the individual(s) involved in a trial or panel requests that the abstract be delayed. If an individual(s) involved in a trial requests that the abstract be delayed, Honor Council will weigh the importance of keeping the community informed with the effects of immediate release on the confidentiality of the involved individual(s). Honor Council will then reach consensus on whether or not to withhold the abstract. Abstracts will typically be withheld for no longer than one year. Alternate procedures are followed for Dean’s Panel abstracts. In cases where essential trial details threaten the confidentiality of the participants, the jury or the parties may request an additional delay from Honor Council. The delay will typically not exceed one semester beyond the participants’ graduation or permanent departure. A decision to delay an abstract may not be altered by subsequent Honor Councils.
4) Additional Abstract Procedure: Abstracts may be published for mediations and discussions as well if Honor Council feels that the community could benefit from their distribution. All abstracts are accessible to the entire community. Following the publication of the abstract, a community wide abstract discussion will be held by Honor Council so that community members can voice their questions and thoughts on the trial. Additionally, any member of the community who would like to speak to the Council about the trial can attend the next Honor Council meeting to discuss the trial.
Honor Council is responsible for making sure that an up-to-date and complete copy of the Honor Code and its guidelines are available to the community. It is also the responsibility of Honor Council to provide up-to-date and informative literature about the Honor Code for prospective students. The Council should keep the Admission Office informed of any changes or new developments that would be of interest to prospective students.
Honor Council should be involved in the education of the community about social concerns such as alcohol abuse, sexual harassment, emotional stress and drug abuse. While Council members are not trained to be crisis counselors, Council can serve as a source of information where students can go for help. In addition, Council can serve as a consciousness-raising body, by holding discussions, sponsoring collections and lectures, and distributing queries about these sensitive issues.
Honor Council should post signs and otherwise remind students that the form, content, and degree of difficulty of any examinations are not to be discussed during finals week. While this rule applies for all exams, it is especially crucial to remind students of the importance of exercising discretion and of not discussing examinations during finals week.
(v) Customs Program
During Customs Week, Honor Council Co-Chairs and Honor Code Orienteers should spend a substantial amount of time discussing the Honor Code with first-year students and transfers. There should be an introduction about the Honor Code made to the entire group of incoming students, including an introduction by Honor Council Co-Chairs, and a historical perspective of the Code given by an appropriate community figure. Each Customs group should have at least one discussion with its Honor Code Orienteer(s). Honor Code Orienteers will be members of the community who have undergone at least one training sessions with Honor Council Co-Chairs.
(vi) Honor Council Member Participation
As student leaders and representatives of the community, Honor Council members are urged to participate in community-oriented activities such as Collection, special lectures, plenary, and community celebrations.
(b) Responsibilities to the Individual
All matters involving individual students which are brought to Honor Council’s attention must remain in strict confidence. No Council member shall discuss cases in progress with other students who are not members of Council. After an abstract has been released, Council members may discuss the case, but should be extremely careful not to reveal the identity of anyone involved.
All persons involved in a trial, including confronting and confronted parties, support persons, and jurors, must maintain confidentiality insofar as it affects all others involved in the trial.
(ii) Consideration of Precedent
While precedent may be used as a guide in handling concerns, each case is still to be considered on its own merits.
If a case must be resolved in a trial, Council members who feel that they cannot be objective should remove themselves from the jury.
Honor Council must follow the stated procedures for handling concerns. A breach of procedure will be grounds by which the confronted student, in the hope of altering the Council’s decision, may appeal to the President of the College. Honor Council as a body is responsible for preventing inconsistencies between written procedure and those physically enacted.
(c) Responsibilities Within Honor Council
Honor Council is charged with interpreting the sections of the Code that leave room for flexibility. It is, for example, Honor Council’s responsibility to decide if a situation warrants the convening of a trial or if it can be resolved on a less formal basis. It is Honor Council’s responsibility to handle each case as a unique situation, yet keep in mind that it is also one of a number of similar occurrences. In interpreting the Code, it is Honor Council’s responsibility to consider both the community and the individual involved, and to try to find the balance between what is best for both.
Honor Council meets on a weekly basis, to discuss current issues involving the Code and any individual concerns which members of the larger community have brought to the Council’s attention. These meetings will be private (i.e. closed to the community) as confidentiality must be observed. Honor Council Co-Chairs can call special meetings in addition to these weekly meetings if it is necessary to do so. In addition, Honor Council will regularly host public meetings that are open to the whole community in order to discuss the Code, abstracts, and questions or concerns that members of the community may have. Anyone may attend these public meetings. Also, minutes of public meetings will be published and posted on a regular basis, to keep the community at large informed of Honor Council’s actions. Individuals with specific concerns are encouraged to contact the Honor Council Co-Chairs directly.
After trials, Council members who were on the jury will discuss the trial in detail with the rest of the Council, sharing their impressions, reactions, and reasons for reaching the decisions they did. This discussion is an important educational experience for both the jury members and the rest of Council. It is important that there be constructive criticism of the process and the performance of the jury so that improvements can be made. Notes shall be recorded of these discussions and made available to future Council members for educational purposes. Confidentiality will be honored when creating entries for this record.
(iv) New Council Members
New Council members are given a thorough introduction to the functioning of Honor Council. They should read abstracts of past cases and be informed of policies and interpretations Council uses. This introduction should include, but is not limited to trainings regarding diversity, mediation and trial procedure.
(v) End of Semester Contingency
At the end of the second semester, Honor Council members may need to remain on campus for a few extra days to finish cases and hold trials, if they cannot wait until the next year.
(c) Responsibilities of Honor Council Co-Chairs
(i) Students’ Council
The Co-Chairs are also a member of Students’ Council and are welcome, but not required, to attend Students’ Council meetings and take part in its activities as well as those of Honor Council.
The Co-Chairs are responsible for seeing that all procedures are followed and that Honor Council’s responsibilities are carried out.
It is the Co-Chairs’ responsibility to see that all Honor Council members participate and share in doing the Council’s work. If some members of the Council are not doing an adequate job, the Co-Chairs should talk to those members and voice his/her concern to them. If improvement is not noted, then the entire Council should discuss the problem. A continued deficiency can result in the Council’s forbidding (by consensus) a student to run for re-election to Honor Council.
(iv) End of Term Reports
At the end of his/her term, the Co-Chairs will submit a report to the next Co-Chairs which describes the Council’s activities (in brief) over the past year, and which gives hints about what to expect and how to deal with specific problems, which may arise. A collection of these reports is to be compiled to aid in the training of the Co-Chairs. The Co-Chairs should read and contribute to this record.
At the end of their term, Honor Council Co-Chairs will submit a written report to the President of the College, reviewing the past year’s cases and Honor Council activities. The President of the College will refer to this report before he/she decides to renew the policy of student administration of the Honor Code for the coming year.
(v) Chairs’ Reports
Honor Council Co-Chairs will keep the Dean of the College informed of cases that come to the Council’s attention. After every trial, the Co-Chairs will notify the Dean of the College of the recommendation of the jury within 24 hours of the trial’s completion. The Co-Chairs will subsequently have three weeks to submit a report to the Dean giving a reasonably detailed account of the trial and the resolution agreed upon by the jury. A cleansed copy of this report will also be submitted to the community member and Honor Council member in charge of writing the abstract for the trial. A file of these reports will be kept by the Dean of the College for only the Co-Chairs to review in cases of separation or the delay of releasing an abstract.
(vi) Faculty Meeting
At the first faculty meeting of every semester, Honor Council Co-Chairs will report to the faculty a summary of the past semester’s Honor Council academic concerns, and social concerns if they so choose.
(vii) New Employee Orientation
At the beginning of every year, an orientation for new faculty members will be held. All new faculty, and those who have been away for a year or more, will be expected to attend. In addition to an orientation for new faculty members, an orientation for the new staff and administration of the college will be held each year.
(d) Responsibilities of Honor Council Co-Secretaries
Honor Council Co-Secretaries are full members of Honor Council and participate in all discussions and mediations which occur in the Council as a whole. It is the specific duty of the Co-Secretaries to take notes and publish minutes of Honor Council meetings, and to take care of the typing and copying of Honor Council publications. Since these tasks can be time-consuming, the Co-Secretaries can be relieved of some other Honor Council duties, at their own discretion.
Since the Co-Secretaries and the Co-Chairs are elected on a staggered basis, it is also the responsibility of the Co-Secretaries to aid the new Co-Chairs in adjusting to their office and to inform them of cases which have been carried over from the previous Co-Chairs.
(iii) Jury Selection
The Co-Secretaries are also responsible for the selection of juries in cases of trial. The Co-Secretaries will also work towards the goal of achieving a more diverse jury or panel by ensuring that several of the members of the panel or jury will be representative of Haverford’s multicultural population as jury selection procedure stipulates. Keeping in mind a balance of gender and class, the Co-Secretaries will request people primarily in the order they are presented. By no means are the Co-Secretaries to prioritize calling people they know to serve on a jury. In choosing jury members, there should be a healthy mixture of experienced and inexperienced Council members, so that new members can gain experience while there is still continuity and overlap in jury membership.
If Honor Council decides that an academic or social trial must be held to resolve a problem, 5 of its 16 members, along with 5 randomly chosen members of the community, will be the jury. The random jurors will be chosen from a random jury list maintained by Honor Council Co-Secretaries.
Honor Council will pursue the goal of achieving a more diverse jury by ensuring that members of the jury will be representative of Haverford’s multicultural population. When the Co-Secretaries email potential jurors, randomly selected from the Haverford student population, they will ask students to fill out a self-identification survey. It will ask whether or not the student in question “identifies as a student of color” and “identifies as a given gender”. This information will not be used again in any form by Honor Council or anyone else. There will be no list maintained of which students at Haverford identify as students of color.
When selecting a jury of ten students, the Co-Secretaries will make sure that there are at least 3 self-identified students of color on a jury and at least 3 students who do not identify as a student of color. In addition, there will be no fewer than four students who identify as male and no fewer than four who identify as female. Proportional adjustments will be made for juries and panels of other sizes. The same proportions will be maintained for juries and panels that are not selected randomly.
(v) Alternate Jurors
The Co-Secretaries should also reserve three community members beyond the number required by the proceeding as alternate jurors who can replace a community juror should the need arise. If the number of jurors required by the proceeding has been reached, the proceeding should begin while the Co-Secretaries continue to find alternate jurors until the fact-finding portion has taken place. At least one of these alternate jurors should self-identify as a student of color. At least one alternate juror should self-identify as male and at least one should self-identify as female. The Co-Secretaries should try to preserve the multicultural composition of the jury to a reasonable extent, while keeping in mind the need to begin a proceeding. An alternate juror may only replace a community juror before the fact-finding portion of a proceeding has been held. Once an alternate juror replaces a community juror, he or she will serve for the remainder of a proceeding.
(e) Responsibilities of the Librarian
(i) Librarian Status
The Librarian of Honor Council is not a full member of Honor Council, but appointed by Students’ Council for a one-year term during the second semester of each academic year from among the student body. The librarian will not be a current-serving member of Honor Council.
The Librarian of Honor Council is responsible for maintaining an updated, documented record of all changes made to the Honor Code over the course of his or her term. This record should also include all major publications (i.e., committee findings, letters of concern to/from the administration and faculty, Spring Plenary Packets, etc.) regarding the Honor Code. This record will remain accessible to all community members so that they can view the history and changes of the Honor Code.
The Librarian is also responsible for analyzing and interpreting previous Honor Codes, trial abstracts and all other relevant documentation to distinguish and report trends and precedents to the Co-Chairs.
(iii) Additional Responsibilities
The Librarian may be given additional responsibilities by Honor Council.
Section 6.03 Honor Council Elections
(a) Honor Council Composition
(i) Honor Council shall be made up of sixteen (16) students, four (4) from each class. Honor Council Co-Chairs and the Co-Secretaries are elected by the entire student body, and the other representatives are elected by the members of their classes only.
(ii) All council members serve one-year terms, except all first-semester and two (2) second-semester first-year students, and seniors elected for the second semester.
(b) Honor Council Nominations
Nominations and elections will be restricted to members of the Students’ Association who intend to be enrolled at Haverford College for the duration of their term in office. Nominations for the office of Honor Council Co-Chairs will be open the second Friday of April. Those nominated for Honor Council Co-Chairs or Co-Secretaries may consist of no more than two Students’ Association members.
(c) Election Procedures
Elections shall be staggered to allow overlap in Council membership of new and experienced members. Elections will run concurrent with the Students’ Council elections unless unusual circumstances arise.
(i) Semester One Election Procedures
In the first three (3) weeks of September, four (4) first-year students and two members from every other class, or the number required to adequately fill all of the respective class positions shall be elected. The first-year students will serve for only one (1) semester.
(ii) Semester Two Election Procedures
Honor Council Co-Secretaries are to be elected in December, for a one-year term. The first-year class again will elect four (4) members in December. The two (2) with the greatest number of votes serve one-year terms. The other two (2) serve one-semester long terms. If any freshmen is currently serving as Co-Chairs or Co-Secretaries, or is elected to either position in the second semester election, then only the remaining number of representatives needed to fill four (4) freshmen positions shall be elected, with priority placed on having freshmen representatives serve a full year term. The other classes will elect two (2) members for one-year terms, except Honor Council Chair(s)’s class and the Co-Secretaries’ class, which will elect as many members as needed to balance the respective class allocations.
(iii) Following Year Elections
Elections for new Honor Council Co-Chairs, to assume office the following year, shall take place in April in conjunction with Students’ Council elections.
(d) Special Elections
If at any time, Honor Council needs to fill a position due to resignation, nominations shall be opened with all due haste by the Students’ Council Co-Secretaries, in correspondence with Honor Council. Normal voting procedures shall apply. Honor Council has the right to appoint temporary members until a new member has been elected.
(e) Voting Procedures for Honor Council Elections
(i) Members will vote on a secret ballot. They may write in the names of members of the Students’ Association in the space that will be provided, or may abstain.
(ii) The ballot will include the following choices:
1) The name of each nominated candidates
2) A space for write-in vote (if a write-in option is selected but no candidate is written in or the student is not a member of the Student’s Association, the vote shall be counted as a “no vote.”)
3) A “no vote” option (voting for this option shall count towards quorum)
4) An opportunity to abstain from voting in that particular election (voting for this option shall not count towards quorum)
(iii) The candidate or candidates with the greatest majority of votes shall assume office.
(iv) If “no-vote” receives more votes than any candidate in a class, the election shall be deemed invalid and nominations shall be re-opened for that class and a re-run election held for all representatives in that class. If “no-vote” does not receive the most votes, but still receives more votes than the number of representatives necessary to be elected in a class, nominations will be re-opened and the elections re-run for that remaining position and the candidates who received the most votes in the first election shall assume office.
(v) If for the election of Honor Council Co-Chairs or Co-Secretaries, fewer than forty percent (40%) of the members of the Students’ Association cast valid ballots, that election shall be considered invalid and will be re-run. If for the election of class representatives, fewer than forty (40%) of the members of that class cast valid ballots, that election shall be considered invalid and will be re-run.
(vi) If any election must be re-run, the Co-Secretaries of Students’ Council, in coordination with Honor Council, shall set a deadline for nominations and a forty-eight (48) hour period for elections to take place. The elections shall be re-run will all due haste.
(vii) If the re-run elections are also considered invalid, or no nominations received for the re-run for Honor Council Co-Chairs, Co-Secretaries or Class Representatives, or if at any point due to extreme circumstances there is a position open on Council, Honor Council will have the right to appoint an interim Honor Council Co-Chairs, Co-Secretaries or Representatives.
(viii) In the event of a tie-vote for any office, a run-off between the tie-vote receivers shall take place. The Co-Secretaries of Students’ Council shall set a forty-eight (48) hour period for elections to take place. The elections shall be re-run will all due haste.
Article VII. Trial Procedure
If a resolution to a conflict cannot be reached through confrontation, Honor Council will decide if the situation needs to be resolved in a trial. A trial is necessary if a student is suspected of having violated our community standards and must, therefore, answer to the community for his/her actions. One of six circumstances will take place:
Section 7.01 Types of Trials
(a) Academic Trial
Honor Council may decide that an academic situation needs to be resolved in a trial. A trial is necessary if a student is suspected of having violated our community academic standards and must, therefore, answer to the community for his/her actions. Almost all cases of suspected academic dishonesty are resolved in a trial. Honor Council will designate a Council member to explain to the confronted individual the alleged charges, to explicitly inform the person of his or her rights, to familiarize the individual with the trial procedure, and to describe the implications and purpose of each step of the trial process.
In cases when dealing with highly sensitive or potentially legal issues the jury may consent to involve a dean in such matters. The choice of dean will be determined by the chair of the trial and Dean of the College based on objectivity and pertinence to the issues involved. The dean will have access to all facts of the case, and may attend meetings if he or she chooses to gain a better understating of the jury consents. Their role is to provide an administrative perspective as well as to inform the jury of College policies and resources. The dean will not be a consenting member of the jury, and will not be part of deliberations unless consented to by the jury.
(b) Social Trial
If a resolution cannot be reached through confrontation, Honor Council will decide if the social situation needs to be resolved in a trial. A trial is necessary if a student is suspected of having violated our community social standards and must, therefore, answer to the community for his/her actions. Honor Council will designate a Council member to explain to the confronted individual the alleged charges, to explicitly inform the person of his or her rights, to familiarize the individual with the trial procedure, and to describe the implications and purpose of each step of the trial process.
(c) Student Facilitation Panel
Often the initial discussion during a confrontation or a mediation is sufficient to resolve a problem between students. In cases when it is not, or in cases when this dialogue is not possible, Honor Council may call a Student Facilitation Panel. The Panel’s primary goals are facilitating respectful communication with the intent of reaching some common understanding, and encouraging individuals to take responsibility and accountability for past actions.
This Panel will consist of six members of the Students’ Association, three of whom will be Honor Council members, including the Co-Chair, and three will be randomly selected community members.
The procedure followed by such Panels is as follows:
Honor Council will designate a Council member to meet separately with each party in order to explain the purpose and implications of the Facilitation Panel process. At this time the confronted and confronting parties will be informed of who will serve on the Student Facilitation Panel and may remove up to two members each if they feel they cannot be objective. During these meetings, the Honor Council member will also help each party to articulate his/her concerns about the issue to be shared with the other party and the Panel. Each party will then prepare a comprehensive statement explaining every issue which s/he wishes to discuss. This statement will be read by each party as well as the Panel prior to any further meeting.
(ii) Preparatory Meeting
The Panel will meet to discuss the parties’ written statements. At this meeting the Panel will be given an introduction to the process and the basic principles of mediation. This introduction will emphasize impartiality and confidentiality, the format of procedure, and a reminder of the goals of this process. At this meeting the Panel will look at the following sorts of questions:
1) How and why did the communication breakdown occur?
2) What are the personal issues that the parties should address?
3) What are the community issues that should be addressed?
4) In considering these types of questions, the Panel will discuss how they envision the Facilitated Dialogue will proceed.
(iii) Facilitated Dialogue
After this preparatory meeting, the Panel and the disputing parties will meet. The parties will each tell their account without interruption. Following the opening narratives, the Honor Council Co-Chair will guide a discussion of the relevant issues and concerns. The discussion and the questions asked will attempt to encourage self-examination and the understanding of the opposing perspectives. This discussion will continue until one of the following occurs:
1) The parties have reached an agreement upon tentative resolutions to their dispute. The meeting will adjourn for at least 24 hours. During this time all parties, including members of the Panel, will reflect on whether or not the tentative resolutions are comprehensive and sufficient. The Panel and the parties will meet afterward to discuss any possible additions or revisions to the tentative resolutions, and to come to final consensus on the resolutions.
2) The parties and the Panel reach consensus that further dialogue will not be productive. The Panel will meet separately in order to deliberate about how the parties’ concerns might be addressed despite the apparent impossibility of further constructive dialogue. They then will formulate and reach consensus upon resolutions. In either d. or e., if one party, or a Panel member, believes that a violation of the Honor Code might have occurred, this possibility will be discussed by the Panel. In order to reach a decision on whether there has been a breach of the Honor Code, the Panel may gather any additional contextual information they think is necessary. This may include contacting additional persons. At the conclusion of this portion of the process the Panel will reach consensus on any statement of violation, if they deem such a statement necessary. If the jury comes to a statement of violation, proceeding will then follow Universal Trial Procedures starting from the end of the Circumstantial portion when resolutions are proposed by the confronting and confronted parties.
(d) Joint Student/Administrative Panel
Joint Panels are to be used for situations that do not require immediate action, but which are, legally, administrative concerns and at the same time concern students socially. Such cases will be dealt with by a joint student-administration committee, consisting of two Honor Council members (to be chosen by Council and the Dean of the College), two Deans selected by the Dean of the College, and four members randomly selected from the community.
Examples of situations where such a committee will be used are drug dealing and cases where legal authorities are active on campus. If either the confronting or confronted parties wish to appeal a decision made by this committee, the appeal must be made to the President of the College within five business days of the completion of the Panel. The Panel will typically be co-chaired by an Honor Council Co-Chair and a dean.
(e) Dean’s Panel
A confrontation regarding sexual misconduct and/or physical violence will normally be brought directly to the Dean of the College. In the event that the confronting party instead chooses to first bring the case to Honor Council, Honor Council will request and review statements from the parties involved and will normally consent to send the case to a Dean’s Panel. If it is unclear whether a confrontation brought to the Dean’s Office merits a Dean’s Panel, the Dean of the College may opt to forward to Honor Council Co-Chairs statements from the parties involved so that Honor Council may consent on an appropriate course of action. The Dean of the College may opt to submit statements which lack identifying information.
Around the time that a Dean’s Panel is convened, the Dean of the College shall notify Honor Council Co-Chairs that such a proceeding is underway. The Dean of the College will also tell Honor Council Co-Chairs the general nature of the potential offense (e.g. a panel convened to deal with a potential case of sexual assault or physical violence). Once the panel has finished, the Dean of the College shall notify Honor Council Co-Chairs of its completion.
Because of the sensitive nature of the issues discussed in Dean’s Panels, special precautions will be taken to protect the confidentiality of all parties involved, and different procedures will be followed regarding abstracts. The parties involved will have a great deal of control in the abstract process. Before an abstract may be released, the confronting party must consent to the amount of information contained in the abstract and the abstract as a whole, as well as a date for release. Input from the confronted party on these matters will also be considered. Less information may be included.
The abstract will be written by the chair of the Dean’s Panel or one of the other deans serving on the panel, and will be completed and presented to the Dean of the College within six weeks of the completion of the panel. The abstract will normally include an account of the general circumstances that merited confrontation, a brief account of each phase of the trial and the direction of the discussions, and a summary of the final resolutions. It will typically be released one year after the confronted and confronting parties have graduated or permanently left campus. If the parties involved are concerned about this release date, a mutually agreeable release date will be found.
When the Dean of the College receives this abstract, s/he will give it to the confronting and confronted parties for them to review the final version of the abstract and final release date. The Dean of the College shall also notify Honor Council Co-Chairs that the abstract has been received, and later when it has been reviewed by the confronted and confronting parties. The Dean of the College shall also inform Honor Council Co-Chairs of the final release date. However, to protect confidentiality, the Co-Chairs will not have access to the content of the abstract until the beginning of the semester specified for its release. Honor Council Co-Chairs will make note of the release date for future Co-Chairs. When Honor Council is given the abstract, it will be reviewed by Abstract Committee and Honor Council will subsequently consent to its release, as per standard abstract guidelines.
(f) Summer Trial
By the end of the academic year, the Co-Secretaries of Honor Council will have gathered a list of students available on campus during the summer to serve on a summer trial. If a violation is reported after the beginning of summer break, the newly-elected Co-Chairs of Honor Council will contact members of the previous semester’s Honor Council and invite four of them to the College where they will decide whether a trial is necessary. If such a trial is called, five additional jurors will be selected randomly from the list of available students and join those council members.
Convening a Summer Trial is optional, for the confronting and confronted parties may refuse and instead wait until the fall to resolve the issue according to the standard trial procedure. Transportation for all off-campus jurors will be funded by the College.
(g) Student Panel
If Honor Council is found to be (by a community member or member of Council) or suspects itself as a body to be in violation of the Honor Code, it is the responsibility of Council to confront itself and organize the convening of a student panel that will decide whether or not Council is in suspicion of violation. One dean selected by the Dean of the College will chair this student panel. The student panel consists of 12 randomly selected members of the community, 3 from each class.
The jury is to be compiled by the Co-Secretaries of Honor Council. The first meeting convened serves to address any questions, comments or concerns regarding the Honor Code or Procedure. At this meeting the panel must decide if Council is in suspicion of violation. If they are not found in suspicion of violation, the matter is dropped and an abstract must be written and published by one of the jury members. If Council is suspected to be in violation of the Honor Code, the panel will serve as a jury to a subsequent trial. The trial will be run under the same time and procedural guidelines set forth in Section B, Universal Trial Procedure. Abstracts must be written and published within a month of the trial and must be approved by the chair of the trial prior to distribution. All decisions must be made via consensus during this process. If Council is found to be in violation of the Honor Code, it is the responsibility of the Student Panel to try to find appropriate means of dealing with this violation. If Honor Council does not agree with the resolutions set forth, they may appeal to the Dean of the College within one week of the end of the trial.
Section 7.02 Universal Trial Procedure
Before the trial, the confronted student and the confronting party will be informed by an Honor Council member about the trial procedure and their roles in the process. The confronted student must be informed in writing of the reasons why he/she was referred to Honor Council, and Honor Council must explain to the student why a trial is being held to resolve the situation. Both the confronted and confronting parties must be informed of who will be on the jury. The confronted and confronting parties may remove a maximum of two jurors each if they feel they cannot be objective. If the confronted and confronting parties choose to, they are allowed to question the originally selected jury in the presence of the Chairs under the discretion of the Chairs, prior to their decision to remove any members.
(b) Role of Honor Council Co-Chair in a Trial:
One of the Co-Chairs of Honor Council is automatically a member of every trial or other procedure, except in extenuating circumstances, when, with the permission of the student involved and the Dean of the College, they need not be. The Honor Council Co-Chair shall act in an appropriate capacity specific to each procedure (i.e. either as chair, jury/panel member, or support person to the chair). In cases where Honor Council Co-Chairs will not be leading the procedure, Honor Council will appoint an experienced Honor Council member best suited to chair the trial, Student Facilitation Panel or Joint Student/Administration Panel. When Honor Council Co-Chairs do not chair a trial/panel, the abstract for that trial/panel will include the role the Co-Chairs played in the trial/panel, and the specific reason(s) for this decision.
(c) Role of the Jury in a Trial:
Every member selected for a jury, including Honor Council members, is expected to have thoroughly read and reviewed the current version of the Honor Code in its entirety prior to serving on a trial. It is encouraged that jury members read past abstracts to review precedence in certain cases. The jury’s task is to find a resolution that balances, as fairly as possible, the interests of the community as a whole and those of the individual student involved. The goals of resolutions are to repair the breach of trust, and to achieve and address accountability and education. Although this is a community based on trust of all community members, there are times when the jury may be presented with a conflict between testimony and apparent fact, or between two testimonies. It is the duty of jury members to balance their trust of community members with their obligation to determine what has happened before they can arrive at any resolutions. If they are ultimately satisfied that their conclusion is correct beyond a reasonable doubt, then they may find the student in violation despite his/her claims to the contrary. The jury will answer three questions:
(i) Does what happened constitute a violation of the Honor Code?
(ii) If it does, what were the circumstances under which this occurred?
(iii) What is an appropriate action in response to this problem?
(d) Role of the Support Person:
The role of a support person is to be available (whether attending a trial or not) for emotional support. Broadly speaking, support people are not supposed to be “witnesses” or “legal counsel,” although their specific role in any particular trial is up to the chair.
(i) For the Confronted and Confronting Parties
The confronted party may bring another community member to the proceedings for support. If the confronting party is a student, s/he may bring another student to act as a support person. It is strongly recommended that a support person have no direct connection to the issue involved in the trial. At any given time during the trial, the confronted or confronting party may request time to meet with their support person. However, this opportunity is under the discretion of the chair.
(ii) For Faculty
If the confronting party is a member of the faculty, s/he may consult with another member of the community for advice and support (as outlined in the Faculty Handbook) although they should not reveal the identity of the confronted party. Faculty members will not attend the trial proceedings as support people.
When the confronting professor is a visiting or first-year professor, he or she will be given the option of having a permanent faculty member also present during all or part of the proceeding, as permanent faculty members are more familiar with the way the Honor Code functions at Haverford and the practice of handling potential violations through Honor Council. The permanent faculty member may clarify points made by the first-year or visiting professor. It will be the role of the jury to determine and consent to appropriate times for the faculty member to speak directly to the jury.
(e) Role of the Bi-College Liaison
In the event that a Bryn Mawr student is suspected of violating Haverford’s Honor Code, or a Haverford student is suspected of violating Bryn Mawr’s Honor Code, a liaison from the student’s home institution’s judicial body will, whenever possible, attend the meeting(s) of the judicial proceeding at the host institution. The Bi-Co Liaison will be a non-consenting participant. The purpose of the Liaison is to keep the home institution informed and serve as a source of knowledge about the home institution. The Liaison will be responsible for attending any necessary meetings, transporting any necessary documents back to the home institution, and bringing up relevant points that the jury may have thus far neglected to consider.
The Liaison at both institutions will be governed by the same set of procedures that were consented to by both the Haverford Honor Council and the Bryn Mawr Honor Board and will be made readily available to the community on Honor Council website. Changes to these guidelines that do not conflict with what has already been stated can be made with the consent of both the Haverford Honor Council and the Bryn Mawr Honor Board.
(f) The Actual Trial:
(i) Fact Finding
At the beginning of the trial, the chair will give a brief review of the trial’s purpose, answer any procedural questions, remind those assembled of the need to maintain confidentiality, and ask jury members whether they feel they can be objective. The jury is required to have fully read and reviewed the most current version of the Honor Code in its entirety prior to the trial. A discussion meeting will be held to address questions, comments and concerns about the Honor Code. The first part of the trial will focus on the facts. The confronting party will tell the jury what he/she believes the problem is, and why he/she felt it should be brought to Honor Council. The student will then give the jury his/her view of the situation.
The jury will be free to ask fact-seeking questions of all parties. Sometimes a jury receives additional statements from parties who have had some involvement in a case but are not formally acting as confronting parties. If the jury thinks that it would be useful to talk with these people in person, or the case involves discrepancies between the different parties’ accounts of the incident(s), the jury may request to speak with the writers of the additional statements.
In cases requiring particular expertise, the Co-Chairs of Honor Council, the EEOC officer, and the Dean of the College may recommend that a member of the community (faculty, staff, administrator, or friend of the College) make their expertise available by serving as a consultant to the jury or panel. Additionally, if a jury thinks it requires greater expertise in order to evaluate a case brought before it, the jury may consent to contact an individual with such expertise who has been thus far uninvolved in the case and who can help the jury more fully understand the situation. This may include professors in the relevant departments at Haverford, Bryn Mawr, and/or Swarthmore.
After the jury feels that it has no more fact-seeking questions, the two parties will leave the room.All persons involved in the trial, including confronting and confronted parties, support persons, and jurors, must maintain confidentiality insofar as it affects all others involved in the trial.
(ii) Jury Deliberation
During the next part of the trial, the jury will decide whether or not it feels that the event described transgresses the values and standards of the community, as expressed in the Honor Code. This decision must be reached through consensus. If there are significant discrepancies between the claims of the confronted and confronting parties and the facts of the case are unclear, the jury should consider not making a decision regarding whether or not a violation occurred in a single night. Instead, the jury should continue to reflect on the situation and attempt to come to a clearer understanding of the incident. During the course of a trial, the jury may request that the confronted party return to answer more factual questions. When this occurs, the confronting party will be given the option of either returning to the proceedings or waiving his/her right to be there. If there is more than one confronted or confronting party in a trial, the jury has the right to request that an individual person be questioned out of the other’s presence. For this action to take place, the confronted and confronting parties must give their consent. If the jury feels it needs to recess until the following business day, it may do so. During a recess, jury members may not discuss cases in progress with anyone, except other jurors and for support purposes. Additionally, the chair of the trial may discuss the cases in progress with Honor Council Co-Chairs and the Dean of the College at their discretion. All individual discussions will be brought to the entire jury’s attention at the next jury meeting. If it is decided that the student’s actions were not in violation of the Code, the matter is dropped, and both parties are so informed. However, the jury still has the option of recommending resolutions to the parties.
If it is decided that the actions were in violation of the Code, then the confronted party will return. It is normally an option for the confronting party to be present. All points made in the confronted party’s absence will be repeated to him/her by the chair. The jury will ask him/her about the circumstances surrounding the event in question. After this discussion, the student will be asked what he/she feels are fair resolutions and why. The jury will then discuss various resolutions with the confronted party. The confronting party is also given the opportunity to propose resolutions and to discuss them with the jury if they so choose.
(iv) Continuation of Jury Deliberation
When the chair feels it appropriate, the parties will leave the room, and the jury will continue discussing resolutions and will reach consensus on the resolutions that it feels are just. Resolution(s) should address such goals as educating the confronted party and the community, repairing the breach of trust between them and the community and holding the person accountable for their actions. After this initial consensus, the jury will adjourn for at least 24 and no more than 48 hours to think privately about the issues involved in the trial, and to rest. In the event that this timeline poses scheduling difficulties, the jury may consent to only count business days toward the timeline. A juror will inform the confronted and confronting parties of the jury’s tentative resolution.
At this point, jury members will not discuss cases in progress with anyone, including other jurors. However, jurors may talk with the trial chair and the trial chair may talk with Honor Council Co-Chairs and the Dean of the College regarding procedural concerns. The jury will then reconvene and either reaffirm its position or reach consensus on another action.
(v) Presentation of the Resolutions
The confronting and confronted parties will then be asked to return to hear the jury’s resolutions and, if they disagree, to present their own to the jury. The confronting party, the confronted party and the jury will discuss their reasons for making their decisions; the confronting and the confronted party will leave; the jury will decide if it wants to change its recommendation. The jury will then reach a final consensus on a recommendation which the Chair will present in writing to the parties involved and the Dean of the College. In addition the jury will be responsible for drafting and consenting to a recommendation to the Dean of the College concerning reporting the violation on Graduate School’s or Transfer School’s application based on the guidelines consented to by Honor Council. Before the trial is adjourned, the jury will choose one of its members to act as a liaison between the jury and the President in the event of an appeal or administrative offering of alternative resolutions. The liaison’s function will be to speak with the President to explain the jury’s position and answer any questions. At that point members of the jury will also be chosen to write the abstract.
It will be the responsibility of Honor Council to make its own recommendation to the Dean of the College concerning reporting the violation on Graduate School’s or Transfer School’s application based on the published guidelines. During review of the abstract, Honor Council will receive the jury’s recommendation and make its own with consideration of the jury’s. If Honor Council makes a decision contrary to the jury’s decision or the guidelines, it must give explicit reasoning. The Dean of the College shall be notified after Honor Council consents to its recommendation. This decision will not be linked to consenting to the abstract, as they are separate decisions.
In an academic case, if the Dean of the College feels that the jury’s resolution(s) is unsatisfactory, he/she may make a recommendation of his/her own to the professor, after discussing the recommendation with the jury. A student’s final grade in a course is the professor’s decision, as neither the jury nor the Dean can do more than recommend to a professor that a certain grade be given in a course. However, in cases where the jury and/or Dean recommend that a student be separated from the College, or any other sanction, which does not involve a grade alteration, the professor has no jurisdictional power to change that resolution(s). In such cases, and in social cases, if the Dean strongly disagrees with the jury’s recommendation, s/he may offer alternative resolution(s) to the President. The Dean’s recommendation will be presented only after discussion with the jury about the resolution(s), and not longer than one week after receiving the chair’s report detailing the trial. Before making a decision, the President will speak with the jury or its liaison. Following their discussion, the President will have one week (while present at the College) to make his/her final decision on what will be done. The involved parties have a period of five business days from the time of the trial’s completion in which to appeal to the President to change the resolution(s). The appeal must be presented orally and in writing, and may be made on either substantive or procedural grounds. Abstracts will be written for all academic trials, social trials, and summer trials, and Student Panel, Student Facilitated Panel, and Joint Panel hearings. These will be distributed to the community in accordance with current constitutional guidelines.
Section 7.03 Special Concerns
(a) Administrative Concerns:
Matters which would tend to overburden the Code (i.e. parking violations) are not handled by Honor Council, but by the appropriate offices of the College. Violent and life- threatening situations which require immediate action are handled by the administration of the College.
(b) Discrimination and Harassment:
Cases involving issues related to sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, class, race, color, age, religion, national origin, physical disability or handicap will normally be heard by a Joint Panel. It is the obligation of the College and of Honor Council to see that Honor Council members receive diversity training to aid them in hearing such cases.
All cases of alleged harassment (including those religiously motivated, motivated by sexual orientation, racist or sexist) brought before Honor Council should also be brought before the Dean of the College. After the Dean of the College and the Co-Chairs of Honor Council have discussed the matter, the case should be brought before an EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) Officer. Should the EEOC Officer decide that EEOC grievance procedures need to be instituted, Honor Council and the deans are asked to remove themselves from any judicial capacity in the case. Should the EEOC Officer decide that EEOC grievance procedures would not be appropriate, then the Co-Chairs of Honor Council, the Dean of the College, and the EEOC Officer will decide on an appropriate course of action. Honor Council will serve as the coordinating body for this decision making process. When a student confronts a Staff or Faculty member for such an incident and the case comes forward for adjudication, it is heard by an EEOC Panel.
(c) Confidentiality and Sexual Misconduct:
In the event that a party separated for sexual misconduct returns to campus, thus violating the resolutions of their separation, the confronting party may permanently break the separated party’s confidentiality without penalty, or ask someone else to do so in order to maintain their own confidentiality.
(d) Violence or Threat of Violence
In the case of violence or threat of violence, where there is a concern for the safety of the community, the Dean of the College may separate a student immediately. After such action, the Co-Chairs of Honor Council, an EEOC officer, and the Dean of the College will meet to review the case and determine if further action through internal judicial processes is indicated. This may be a Dean’s Panel.
(e) Mediation by Deans
In situations where formal adjudication does not appear necessary, the Deans Office may be asked to mediate conflicts of an unusual nature. These mediations will be separate from the judicial processes. Participation in a mediation does not preclude a later decision to pursue a case through formal judicial avenues.
In the interests of fairness to the confronted party and with respect for the needs of the community, the confronting party/ies must make a decision to take a complaint through judicial avenues in a timely fashion once the complaint is raised. Once a decision has been made to take a case through judicial avenues, this must also proceed in a timely manner.
(g) Extenuating Circumstances
Under extraordinary circumstances that make normal jury selection or standard trial procedures impossible, in the interest of timely resolution to a case and fairness to the parties involved, Honor Council shall make the minimum necessary modifications to move the proceedings forward. Such modifications must preserve the substance of universal trial procedures and uphold the spirit of the Honor Code. Both Honor Council and the involved parties must consent to the modifications in order for them to occur. During College breaks, the greatest practical number of Honor Council members, five at a minimum, must consent to the modifications.
In the event of the resignation or removal of an officer or co-officer of the Students’ Association, the Association will immediately fill the vacancy, which is to be considered the entire office, joint or other-wise, according to the election procedure specified herein, provided that there is sufficient time remaining in the term, as judged by Students’ Council, to make such a election practical and necessary. In the interim, the vacancy will be filled by the pro tempore replacements provided for herein. Should a vacancy occur among Students’ Council when a representative is elected by his or her class to the Honor Council or is elected by the Students’ Association as one of its officers, or resigns or is removed from office, the vacancy will be filled immediately according to the election procedure specified herein provided that there is sufficient time remaining in the term, as judged by Students’ Council or the Honor Council (Co-)Chair(s). Should a vacancy occur among the members of the Honor Council, the class whose representation has been reduced, according to the election procedure specified herein, will fill it immediately.
Any officer or representative of Students’ Council or member of Honor Council (elected officials) will be removed from office for malfeasance or neglect of duty by the following procedure:
Any member of the Students’ Association may enact a petition for the removal of an elected official. They must collect signatures of 20% of the students in the elected official’s constituency, be that a class (in the case of representatives to Honor Council, the Board of Managers, or the Class Representatives), or the entire student body (in the case of officers).
Students’ signatures represent their support of the value of discussion of the elected official’s conduct of office, but may not necessarily represent a vote of no confidence. These signatures shall be presented to Students’ Council in a timely fashion. If it is a member of Students’ Council being impeached, that member shall remove him- or herself from the presentation and discussion of the signatures.
Students’ Council shall immediately inform the impeached party and must receive a prompt response. Within twenty-four (24) hours of receiving a response from the impeached party, Students’ Council shall announce the impeachment vote to the school through the most rapid and widespread method(s) available.
As soon as the announcement is made, a 48-hour campaign period shall begin, for both the impeached party and the impeaching party. If at all feasible, a well-publicized forum or other open, in-person community meeting should be held by Students’ Council or Honor Council (as appropriate with the position of the impeached party). Priority in scheduling the forum shall be given to the impeached party’s schedule.
At the end of the 48-hours, polls shall open to the impeached party(ies)’s constituency. The question shall be a vote of confidence or no confidence. If the vote of no confidence meets or exceeds a two-thirds (2/3) majority out of a fifty-percent (50%) or more quorum, the impeached officer shall be removed from power immediately. If the officer held a position with another (un-impeached) person, they shall both be removed from office.
The impeached officer may not run in the subsequent election for their previously held position, although they may run in later open elections for the position. If one of the officers removed was not impeached but removed due to holding office with the impeached party, they may run for the vacated position.
If quorum is not reached or if the vote is less than a two-thirds (2/3) majority to “no confidence,” the officer remains in their position.
In the event that elections of the officers to the Students’ Association are suspected to be flawed or procedurally illegitimate, the election can be declared illegitimate and its results voided by a majority vote of a plenary session of the Students’ Association. Students’ Council will call a Plenary session for this purpose at its own discretion or on the petition of twenty percent (20%) of the Students’ Association. Petitions to challenge elections by Plenary and Students’ Council decisions to call Plenary for such a purpose must be executed within ten days following the election. In the event that quorum is not reached, an additional ten (10) days are allowed to repeat the procedure. In the event that Plenary declares an election flawed or procedurally illegitimate, elections of all offices involved must be re- held within seven (7) days of the Plenary decision. No officer whose election is in question will take office until the challenge is resolved.
An election of Students’ Association representatives can be declared flawed or procedurally illegitimate and its results voided by a majority vote of at least forty percent (40%) of the members of the class in a general meeting assembled. Such a meeting can be called by a petition of at least twenty percent (20%) of the class submitted to Students’ Council within ten (10) days of the election. If the election is declared illegitimate, it must be re-held within seven (7) days of the class’ decision.
An election of Honor Council representatives can be of the class whose election is in question, to be conducted in a general meeting of that class. Such declared flawed or procedurally illegitimate and its results voided by a majority vote of at least forty percent (40%) of the members a meeting can be called by a petition of at least twenty percent (20%) of the class submitted to Honor Council within ten (10) days of the election. If the election is declared illegitimate, it must be re-held within seven (7) days of the class’s decision.
Every four years, following the spring Plenary, students will convene a Clearness Committee to evaluate the quality of student life. This committee will be composed of four students, a faculty member, a college administrator, and the Honor Council Librarian.
The Clearness Committee will evaluate the Honor Code and its implementation and the Students’ Association and its governance. In this regard the committee will consider the Student Constitution, the Honor Code, handbook policies, administrative practices, and the allocation of college and student funds.
By consensus of its members, the committee may expand or contract the scope of its review.
Students, clubs, staff, faculty, and administrators, may submit queries for the committee’s consideration.
The committee will consider the responsiveness, sustainability, and adherence to the Honor Code of the subjects of evaluation.
Does the subject respond to student concerns in a productive, timely, and inclusive way?
Is the subject empowered through an effective institutional memory mechanism and provided with resources necessary to executing its mission?
Are the subject’s policies and practices compatible with the spirit of the Honor Code?
Starting in the spring of 2006 and every four years thereafter, the student government appointment process will select four students to serve on the committee. The chair of the appointments committee, in consultation with the Provost and the Dean of the College, will select the remaining committee members. The committee will select one of the students to serve as chair.
Before the close of the semester, the committee will conduct a census of the student association to discover the prevailing attitudes of the association.
The committee will conduct interviews with student government officers, faculty members, administrators, and other community members as they deem necessary. In these interviews the committee will have access to confidential information necessary to fulfilling their mission. The committee should consider the records of the Honor Council Librarian.
By December, the committee will publish a report with the results of their inquiries. It will be published by consensus of its members. The report may contain recommendations for the following plenary session of the students’ association.
All reports from Clearness Committees must be archived and available in the College Library.
Proposal Amendments to this Constitution may be proposed by Students’ Council or by action taken at a Plenary session of the Students’ Association called for that purpose.
Amendments will be ratified by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of a Plenary session of the Students’ Association.
This Constitution will be put on permanent reserve at Magill Library and otherwise made readily available.
With the enactment of this Constitution, all previous Constitutions of the Students’ Association will be rendered null and void.
Constitution Revised October 6, 2013
Honor Code Revised March 24th 2013. Ratified March 24th, 2013.